
Research-area geological map and Pit N drillhole control
The map locates the research area and boreholes that constrain the geological interpretation.
EVIDENCE
Browse the complete project archive below. Rock and outcrop photographs are presented as the original field images; maps, logs, documents and software records use short descriptions of what is shown and how it was used.
SOURCE 01
Rock photographs from this research are collected in the Rock Outcrop section below.

The map locates the research area and boreholes that constrain the geological interpretation.

The figure summarizes the vertical order and correlation of the principal lithologic and coal intervals.

The figure records the terrain setting surrounding the coal-bearing succession.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam D.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam C.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through C–D interburden.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam B2.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through B2–C interburden.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam B1.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through B1–B2 interburden.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam A2.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through A2–B1 interburden.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through roof of Seam A1.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam A1.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through A1–A2 interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam D.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam C.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for C–D interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam B2.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for B2–C interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam B1.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for B1–B2 interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam A2.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for A2–B1 interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for roof of Seam A1.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam A1.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for A1–A2 interburden.

The multiwell panel integrates facies, markers and interpreted stratigraphic packages across five wells.

Topographic data are displayed as the surface control for the three-dimensional model.

The structure-contour map and surface represent the interpreted elevation of Seam A1.

The structure-contour map and surface represent the interpreted elevation of Seam A2.

The structure-contour map and surface represent the interpreted elevation of Seam B1.

The structure-contour map and surface represent the interpreted elevation of Seam B2.

The structure-contour map and surface represent the interpreted elevation of Seam C.

The structure-contour map and surface represent the interpreted elevation of Seam D.

The model stacks the principal coal-seam surfaces within the topographic framework.

The section cuts through the three-dimensional seam surfaces to show their vertical and lateral relationships.

The section cuts through the three-dimensional seam surfaces to show their vertical and lateral relationships.

The section cuts through the three-dimensional seam surfaces to show their vertical and lateral relationships.
SOURCE 02
Rock photographs from the internship archive are collected in the Rock Outcrop section below.

Borehole-location map.

The figure records the terrain setting surrounding the coal-bearing succession.

Coal-quality plots compare calorific value with the measured quality parameters for Seam A1.

Coal-quality plots compare calorific value with the measured quality parameters for Seam A2.

Coal-quality plots compare calorific value with the measured quality parameters for Seam B1.

Coal-quality plots compare calorific value with the measured quality parameters for Seam B2.

Coal-quality plots compare calorific value with the measured quality parameters for Seam C.

Coal-quality plots compare calorific value with the measured quality parameters for Seam D.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam D.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam C and parting.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through C–D interburden.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam B2.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through B2–C interburden.

The core panel records the vertical lithologic succession through Seam B1.

B1–B2 parting and interburden.

Seam A2, Seam A1 and A1–A2 interburden.

A2 interburden and marker interval.

Parting within Seam A2.

Roof of Seam A1.

A1–A2 interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam D.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam C.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for C–D interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam B2.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for B2–C interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam B1.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for B1–B2 interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam A2.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for A2–B1 interburden.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for roof of Seam A1.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for Seam A1.

Gamma-ray, lithology and correlated markers are displayed for A1–A2 interburden.
SOURCE 03
All field photographs from Karangkancana are collected in the Rock Outcrop section below.

Elevation distribution used to define relief, watershed position and the topographic context of mapped units.

Slope classes support terrain segmentation and field-access or mass-movement interpretation.

Photographs record slope failures at several villages and connect geomorphic mapping with field evidence.

Channel reaches are separated for morphologic comparison.

Drainage geometry is used to assess terrain and possible lithologic or structural control.

Landscape photograph supports the mapped volcanic geomorphology.

Conical to steep-sided carbonate landform supports the karst geomorphology unit.

Landscape photograph provides geomorphic context for the mapped fold.

Landscape photograph is used to illustrate the ridge associated with the mapped anticline.

Flat low-relief alluvial surface records active fluvial deposition.

Petrographic image supports mineralogy and texture of the Halang sandstone sample.

Two close views show thin parallel lamination and grain-size contrast.

Taxonomic plate provides material for relative-age interpretation.

Range overlap is intended to constrain the age of the Halang sandstone sample.

Benthic assemblage is used for palaeobathymetric interpretation.

Ecological ranges are combined to infer depositional depth.

Petrography is used to support the fine-grained Halang unit.

Assemblage supports relative-age analysis of the Halang fine-grained unit.

Range overlap is intended to date the claystone sample.

Assemblage supports environmental interpretation.

Range chart attempts to place the sample within upper bathyal conditions.

The model provides a framework for comparing observed facies with fan elements.

Thin section documents carbonate grains, matrix and cement.

Assemblage is used to date the Lebakwangi carbonate.

Range overlap is used to infer Late Miocene–Early Pliocene age.

Benthic taxa are used for palaeobathymetry.

Chart combines benthic depth ranges.

Petrography characterizes a volcanic clast within the coarse unit.

Figure summarizes the mapped units and their interpreted relationship.

Stereonet combines fault plane, slip indicator and inferred stress orientation.

Orientation data are used to estimate fold axis and axial geometry.

Orientation data are used to estimate the syncline axis.

Diagram synthesizes regional compression, folds and fault development.

Section integrates map units, topography, bedding and structures.

Structural Analysis — Sheet 01 compiles orientation data, stereographic output or section geometry used in the structural analysis.

Structural Analysis — Sheet 02 compiles orientation data, stereographic output or section geometry used in the structural analysis.

Structural Analysis — Sheet 03 compiles orientation data, stereographic output or section geometry used in the structural analysis.

Structural Analysis — Sheet 04 compiles orientation data, stereographic output or section geometry used in the structural analysis.

Structural Analysis — Sheet 05 compiles orientation data, stereographic output or section geometry used in the structural analysis.

Structural Analysis — Sheet 06 compiles orientation data, stereographic output or section geometry used in the structural analysis.

Final Geomorphological Map — Sheet 07 compiles the mapped units, boundaries and spatial control used in the project.

Final Geological Map — Sheet 08 compiles the mapped units, boundaries and spatial control used in the project.

Petrography — Sheet 09 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 10 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 11 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 12 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 13 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 14 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 15 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 16 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 17 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 18 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.

Petrography — Sheet 19 records the mineral, fossil, matrix/cement and textural relationships visible in thin section.
ROCK PHOTOGRAPHS
77 photographs from the thesis, internship and geological mapping archives.
SOURCE 04

Stage 01 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: the map, layer list and attribute table are reviewed together to confirm polygon identity, field values and layer order before symbol assignment.

Stage 02 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: a selected polygon layer is symbolised from its geological attribute, with fill colour and class settings adjusted in the Symbology pane.

Stage 03 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: colour-coded polygons are compared with the attribute table to verify that each mapped unit is assigned to the intended class.

Stage 04 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: symbol properties are adjusted for individual geological classes while the mapped polygons remain visible against the terrain base.

Stage 05 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: geological features are selected and inspected against the basemap to confirm their extent, identity and spatial relationship with neighbouring units.

Stage 06 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: the mapped units are displayed with a revised colour hierarchy and contrasting boundaries to improve separation between formations.

Stage 07 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: formation polygons, linear features and point observations are inspected together to locate boundary gaps, overlaps or features assigned to the wrong unit.

Stage 08 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: alternative colour classifications are compared on the same mapped extent to confirm that the final legend preserves the intended unit relationships.

Stage 09 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: the geological map is arranged with its thematic layers, drainage and supporting map elements in a publication layout.

Stage 10 of the ArcGIS Pro sequence: the completed map and legend are reviewed at output scale, with the final symbology and page composition visible together.

Stage 01 of the Rocscience Dips sequence: orientation data, slope attitude, friction angle and kinematic-analysis settings are entered before the stereonet is evaluated.

Stage 02 of the Rocscience Dips sequence: pole-density clusters, mean discontinuity sets and the critical kinematic zone are reviewed on the stereonet to identify structurally admissible failure directions.

The TOPO view displays the contour network used to establish elevation control and the upper boundary of the seam model.

Topography and the interpreted floors of Seams A2, B1, B2 and C are displayed together to inspect stratigraphic order and lateral geometry.

Vertical cells are generated between the model boundaries, converting the surface interpretation into a spatial framework that can carry geological attributes.

The wireframe exposes cell arrangement, lateral extent and vertical conformity to the model boundaries.

The plan view shows colour-separated cell domains alongside the controlling polygon objects.

Stage 01 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the Micromine Origin project view displays the active geological objects at the 3d project scene and data loading stage.

Stage 02 of the Micromine Origin sequence: drillholes and their coded intervals are displayed in three dimensions to confirm collar positions, trace orientation and the spatial distribution of geological control.

Stage 03 of the Micromine Origin sequence: interpretation strings are reviewed across the available sections, preserving the boundaries used to construct the geological domain.

Stage 04 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the interpreted boundary is converted into a triangulated surface and inspected for continuity, edge behaviour and local geometric artefacts.

Stage 05 of the Micromine Origin sequence: bounding surfaces are joined into a closed geological solid that represents the interpreted three-dimensional domain.

Stage 06 of the Micromine Origin sequence: a sectional cut exposes the internal relationship between the model, interpreted boundaries and the available geological control.

Stage 07 of the Micromine Origin sequence: bounding surfaces are joined into a closed geological solid that represents the interpreted three-dimensional domain.

Stage 08 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the geological interpretation is placed against the topographic surface to verify its position, extent and relationship with the ground surface.

Stage 09 of the Micromine Origin sequence: a regular three-dimensional cell framework is generated across the interpreted domain, providing the structure required to store geological or quantitative attributes.

Stage 10 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the model is coloured by an assigned attribute so that spatial changes and domain boundaries can be inspected directly.

Stage 11 of the Micromine Origin sequence: a sectional cut exposes the internal relationship between the model, interpreted boundaries and the available geological control.

Stage 12 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 13 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 14 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 15 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the principal model components are assembled in a final three-dimensional view for technical review and communication.

Stage 16 of the Micromine Origin sequence: the principal model components are assembled in a final three-dimensional view for technical review and communication.

Stage 01 of the Petrel sequence: the Petrel project tree and well-section window are organised so that logs, markers, facies tracks and model objects can be reviewed from a single correlation workspace.

Stage 02 of the Petrel sequence: gamma-ray, density, lithology and interpreted tracks are arranged at a common vertical scale for direct comparison.

Stage 03 of the Petrel sequence: multiple wells are aligned in one correlation panel, with markers and interpreted intervals connected across the section.

Stage 04 of the Petrel sequence: log curves, marker picks and interval boundaries are adjusted at well scale while neighbouring wells remain visible for control.

Stage 05 of the Petrel sequence: log curves, marker picks and interval boundaries are adjusted at well scale while neighbouring wells remain visible for control.

Stage 06 of the Petrel sequence: log curves, marker picks and interval boundaries are adjusted at well scale while neighbouring wells remain visible for control.

Stage 07 of the Petrel sequence: colour-coded electrofacies or property tracks are inspected beside the wireline logs and correlated markers.

Stage 08 of the Petrel sequence: multiple wells are aligned in one correlation panel, with markers and interpreted intervals connected across the section.

Stage 09 of the Petrel sequence: colour-coded electrofacies or property tracks are inspected beside the wireline logs and correlated markers.

Stage 10 of the Petrel sequence: multiple wells are aligned in one correlation panel, with markers and interpreted intervals connected across the section.

Stage 11 of the Petrel sequence: the correlated wells are positioned within a three-dimensional structural context to check the spatial relationship between the section and the model framework.

Stage 12 of the Petrel sequence: a three-dimensional surface or horizon object is isolated to inspect its geometry relative to the available well control.

Stage 13 of the Petrel sequence: a diagnostic plot and project controls are used to review the consistency of the interpreted model against the available data.

Stage 01 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: interpretation strings are reviewed across the available sections, preserving the boundaries used to construct the geological domain.

Stage 02 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: drillholes and their coded intervals are displayed in three dimensions to confirm collar positions, trace orientation and the spatial distribution of geological control.

Stage 03 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: interpretation strings are reviewed across the available sections, preserving the boundaries used to construct the geological domain.

Stage 04 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: interpretation strings are reviewed across the available sections, preserving the boundaries used to construct the geological domain.

Stage 05 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the GEOVIA Surpac project view displays the active geological objects at the wireframe construction stage.

Stage 06 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the interpreted boundary is converted into a triangulated surface and inspected for continuity, edge behaviour and local geometric artefacts.

Stage 07 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: bounding surfaces are joined into a closed geological solid that represents the interpreted three-dimensional domain.

Stage 08 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the geological interpretation is placed against the topographic surface to verify its position, extent and relationship with the ground surface.

Stage 09 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 10 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: a regular three-dimensional cell framework is generated across the interpreted domain, providing the structure required to store geological or quantitative attributes.

Stage 11 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the model is coloured by an assigned attribute so that spatial changes and domain boundaries can be inspected directly.

Stage 12 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: a sectional cut exposes the internal relationship between the model, interpreted boundaries and the available geological control.

Stage 13 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 14 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 15 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 16 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the principal model components are assembled in a final three-dimensional view for technical review and communication.

Stage 17 of the GEOVIA Surpac sequence: the principal model components are assembled in a final three-dimensional view for technical review and communication.

Stage 01 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the geological interpretation is placed against the topographic surface to verify its position, extent and relationship with the ground surface.

Stage 02 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the principal model components are assembled in a final three-dimensional view for technical review and communication.

Stage 03 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: drillholes and their coded intervals are displayed in three dimensions to confirm collar positions, trace orientation and the spatial distribution of geological control.

Stage 04 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: interpretation strings are reviewed across the available sections, preserving the boundaries used to construct the geological domain.

Stage 05 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the interpreted boundary is converted into a triangulated surface and inspected for continuity, edge behaviour and local geometric artefacts.

Stage 06 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the interpreted boundary is converted into a triangulated surface and inspected for continuity, edge behaviour and local geometric artefacts.

Stage 07 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: bounding surfaces are joined into a closed geological solid that represents the interpreted three-dimensional domain.

Stage 08 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 09 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: a regular three-dimensional cell framework is generated across the interpreted domain, providing the structure required to store geological or quantitative attributes.

Stage 10 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the model is coloured by an assigned attribute so that spatial changes and domain boundaries can be inspected directly.

Stage 11 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the model is coloured by an assigned attribute so that spatial changes and domain boundaries can be inspected directly.

Stage 12 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: a sectional cut exposes the internal relationship between the model, interpreted boundaries and the available geological control.

Stage 13 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 14 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 15 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the geological model is displayed with a design or volume boundary to examine the portion of the domain contained within the selected limit.

Stage 16 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the Maptek Vulcan project view displays the active geological objects at the integrated 3d scene stage.

Stage 17 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the interpreted surfaces, solids or model cells are isolated and compared to check continuity, boundary conformity and internal consistency.

Stage 18 of the Maptek Vulcan sequence: the principal model components are assembled in a final three-dimensional view for technical review and communication.

Stage 01 of the Rocscience Slide2 sequence: the section geometry and material units are drawn from the interpreted subsurface profile, preserving the principal layer boundaries and slope form.

Stage 02 of the Rocscience Slide2 sequence: the search method and admissible slip-surface geometry are configured against the modelled slope section.

Stage 03 of the Rocscience Slide2 sequence: the completed slope model is submitted to the limit-equilibrium calculation after geometry, materials and search controls have been defined.

Stage 04 of the Rocscience Slide2 sequence: the interpreted stratigraphic section is reviewed with the analysis display to check the model geometry and the location of the calculated result.

Stage 14 of the Petrel sequence: a vertical seismic section carries several interpreted horizons, allowing reflector continuity and structural relief to be followed along one line.

Stage 15 of the Petrel sequence: intersecting seismic panels display the same interpreted horizons from different directions, exposing misties and inconsistent picks at line intersections.

Stage 16 of the Petrel sequence: intersecting seismic panels display the same interpreted horizons from different directions, exposing misties and inconsistent picks at line intersections.

Stage 17 of the Petrel sequence: intersecting seismic panels display the same interpreted horizons from different directions, exposing misties and inconsistent picks at line intersections.

Stage 18 of the Petrel sequence: display opacity and colour controls are adjusted while the seismic volume and interpretation remain visible.

Stage 19 of the Petrel sequence: interpreted horizons are traced across a vertical seismic section, including intervals where reflector continuity is disrupted.

Stage 20 of the Petrel sequence: intersecting seismic panels display the same interpreted horizons from different directions, exposing misties and inconsistent picks at line intersections.

Stage 21 of the Petrel sequence: the interpreted horizon is converted to a colour-ramped surface and viewed together with the seismic control from which it was derived.

Stage 22 of the Petrel sequence: interpreted horizons are traced across a vertical seismic section, including intervals where reflector continuity is disrupted.

Stage 23 of the Petrel sequence: the interpreted horizon is converted to a colour-ramped surface and viewed together with the seismic control from which it was derived.

Stage 24 of the Petrel sequence: the interpreted horizon is converted to a colour-ramped surface and viewed together with the seismic control from which it was derived.

Stage 25 of the Petrel sequence: fault traces and fault sticks are displayed on orthogonal seismic panels, with horizon offsets providing structural control.

Stage 26 of the Petrel sequence: fault traces and fault sticks are displayed on orthogonal seismic panels, with horizon offsets providing structural control.

Stage 27 of the Petrel sequence: a single fault surface is positioned against the seismic and horizon framework to review its dip, extent and intersection geometry.

Stage 28 of the Petrel sequence: a single fault surface is positioned against the seismic and horizon framework to review its dip, extent and intersection geometry.

Stage 29 of the Petrel sequence: a single fault surface is positioned against the seismic and horizon framework to review its dip, extent and intersection geometry.

Stage 30 of the Petrel sequence: multiple fault-stick sets are assembled in three dimensions, revealing segmentation, overlap and the structural density of the interpreted network.

Stage 31 of the Petrel sequence: multiple fault-stick sets are assembled in three dimensions, revealing segmentation, overlap and the structural density of the interpreted network.

Stage 32 of the Petrel sequence: multiple fault-stick sets are assembled in three dimensions, revealing segmentation, overlap and the structural density of the interpreted network.

Stage 33 of the Petrel sequence: multiple fault-stick sets are assembled in three dimensions, revealing segmentation, overlap and the structural density of the interpreted network.

Stage 34 of the Petrel sequence: colour-coded fault surfaces have been generated from the interpreted stick sets, allowing individual structures and intersections to be distinguished.

Stage 35 of the Petrel sequence: a colour-ramped structural surface is inspected in map view to identify relief, lineaments and fault-controlled discontinuities.

Stage 36 of the Petrel sequence: a colour-ramped structural surface is inspected in map view to identify relief, lineaments and fault-controlled discontinuities.

Stage 37 of the Petrel sequence: the mapped surface is intersected by vertical seismic panels, tying surface morphology back to the interpreted reflectors and faults.

Stage 38 of the Petrel sequence: a colour-ramped structural surface is inspected in map view to identify relief, lineaments and fault-controlled discontinuities.

Stage 39 of the Petrel sequence: the mapped surface is intersected by vertical seismic panels, tying surface morphology back to the interpreted reflectors and faults.

Stage 40 of the Petrel sequence: seismic panels, interpreted horizons and fault surfaces are displayed together in the final three-dimensional structural scene.

Stage 41 of the Petrel sequence: a colour-ramped structural surface is inspected in map view to identify relief, lineaments and fault-controlled discontinuities.

Stage 42 of the Petrel sequence: a derived surface attribute is displayed continuously and categorically to emphasise lineaments, local relief changes and structural texture.

Stage 43 of the Petrel sequence: a derived surface attribute is displayed continuously and categorically to emphasise lineaments, local relief changes and structural texture.

Stage 44 of the Petrel sequence: the mapped surface is intersected by vertical seismic panels, tying surface morphology back to the interpreted reflectors and faults.

Stage 45 of the Petrel sequence: several interpreted horizon surfaces are stacked and contoured to review stratigraphic order, vertical separation and local surface shape.

Stage 46 of the Petrel sequence: several interpreted horizon surfaces are stacked and contoured to review stratigraphic order, vertical separation and local surface shape.

Stage 47 of the Petrel sequence: several interpreted horizon surfaces are stacked and contoured to review stratigraphic order, vertical separation and local surface shape.

Stage 48 of the Petrel sequence: several interpreted horizon surfaces are stacked and contoured to review stratigraphic order, vertical separation and local surface shape.

Stage 49 of the Petrel sequence: several interpreted horizon surfaces are stacked and contoured to review stratigraphic order, vertical separation and local surface shape.

Stage 50 of the Petrel sequence: the fault framework is combined with overlying horizons or a grid-based structural surface, forming the principal geometry of the model.

Stage 51 of the Petrel sequence: the fault framework is combined with overlying horizons or a grid-based structural surface, forming the principal geometry of the model.

Stage 52 of the Petrel sequence: the fault framework is combined with overlying horizons or a grid-based structural surface, forming the principal geometry of the model.

Stage 53 of the Petrel sequence: seismic panels, interpreted horizons and fault surfaces are displayed together in the final three-dimensional structural scene.

Stage 54 of the Petrel sequence: seismic panels, interpreted horizons and fault surfaces are displayed together in the final three-dimensional structural scene.

Stage 55 of the Petrel sequence: seismic panels, interpreted horizons and fault surfaces are displayed together in the final three-dimensional structural scene.
SOURCE 05

RTB 09 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 20 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 09 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 21 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 09 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 22 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 09 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 23 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 09 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 24 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 11 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 25 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 11 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 26 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 11 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 27 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTB 11 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 28 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 74 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 29 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 74 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 30 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 74 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 31 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 74 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 32 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 33 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 34 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 35 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 36 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 37 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 38 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 01 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 39 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 06 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 40 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 06 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 41 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 06 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 42 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 06 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 43 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 06 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 44 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

RTS 06 Stratigraphic Panel — Sheet 45 preserves the original well-log or stratigraphic panel, including marker positions and the vertical relationship of coal and interburden intervals.

Integrated Stratigraphic Correlation — Sheet 46 combines lithology, core, log motifs and correlated markers within one stratigraphic panel.
SOURCE 06

Advance Well Control records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

APDI Drone Training records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

ArcGIS Pro Training records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Geotechnical Software Suite records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Micromine EduBlast records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

MineScape Planning records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Geological Modelling Training records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

PT Bukit Asam Internship records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Surpac & MineSched records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Surpac Resource Modelling records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Vulcan Foundation records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Current three-page CV covering mining, field mapping, oil and gas, geothermal, subsurface interpretation, GIS, geological modelling, research, training and leadership.

Undergraduate Thesis Visual Archive records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Geological Mapping Visual Archive records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

PTBA Internship Visual Archive records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Accepted Manuscript records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Letter of Acceptance records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.

Petrel Reservoir Training — Completion with Grade A records formal training, participation or completion issued by the named provider.
SOURCE 07

Published Article — GeoScienceEd Journal 7(1) forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 01 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 02 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 03 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 04 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 05 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 06 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 07 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 08 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 09 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 10 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 11 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 12 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 13 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Accepted Manuscript — Page 14 forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.

Letter of Acceptance — Original Record forms part of the manuscript, acceptance or publication record retained in the portfolio.
SOURCE 08

The organising committee checks participant readiness and coordinates the room before the technical programme begins.

Committee members are documented in the event uniform after completing preparation for the Pertamina Hulu Rokan programme.

The presentation introduces Pertamina’s AKHLAK values and the organisational context of the upstream programme.

A commemorative token is presented to the host representative at the close of the programme.

The group photograph records the organising committee, participants and host representatives after the technical session.

A technical presentation is in progress while the committee manages the room, participants and supporting equipment.

The final session brings together the committee and host team after the programme activities have been completed.

The committee and participants gather at Universitas Sriwijaya with the official visit banner before travelling to the geothermal facility.

The group is documented at the Ulubelu facility after arrival for the industry programme.

An individual photograph at the facility entrance confirms the location and institutional context of the visit.

The full delegation is documented with the official visit banner before the technical programme.

Participants attend a technical briefing with site helmets prepared for the field programme.

Participants and instructors are documented after completing the supervised UAV training activities.

Participants practise equipment preparation and component handling under instructor supervision.

The instructor and participant document the completion of the practical training session.